Domains with authentication warnings
SPF, DKIM and DMARC audit with an actionable remediation plan
Review public mail records, sending identities and alignment so legitimate mail streams have a clear authentication foundation.
A prioritized report that explains what is present, what is missing and what should change.
Teams adding a new sending provider
Businesses preparing DMARC enforcement
Useful deliverables.
Clean boundaries.
Exact scope is confirmed after the current environment, business requirement and dependencies are reviewed.
- 01
MX, SPF, DKIM and DMARC review
- 02
Alignment and SPF lookup assessment
- 03
PTR and HELO review where applicable
- 04
Sending-source inventory template
- 05
Prioritized remediation and validation steps
Visible from assessment
to handover.
Discover
Identify legitimate senders and public DNS records.
Assess
Review syntax, alignment, delegation and policy risk.
Remediate
Prepare exact provider-specific changes for approval.
Verify
Recheck propagation and validate representative messages.
Permission is a technical requirement.
Work is limited to transactional messages and recipients who requested or consented to communication. Purchased lists, deceptive identities, phishing and filter bypassing are not supported.
Clear before
access is shared.
Is the homepage DNS checker a complete audit?+
No. It checks only public MX, SPF and DMARC presence. A manual audit includes sending-source inventory, DKIM selectors, alignment, PTR and message-level validation.
Will you immediately set DMARC to reject?+
Not without evidence that all legitimate sources align. Enforcement should follow discovery and monitoring to avoid blocking valid mail.
Can one SPF record include every provider?+
It can authorize multiple sources, but DNS-lookup limits and unnecessary includes must be managed carefully.